The 5Es are an instructional model
encompassing the phases Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate,
steps which educators have traditionally taught students to move through in
phases.
First, instructors open a lesson with an activity or question
meant to engage students,
snag their interest, and offer the opportunity for them to share what they
already know on the subject. This phase might include helping them make
connections between their preexisting knowledge base and the new ideas that
will come down the pipeline in the lesson or unit. Many educators use
traditional KWL charts, in which students list what they already know and what
they want to learn during this step. At the end of the lesson, students go back
to this chart to list what they learned.
After engage comes explore,
in which students carry out hands-on activities. Through their experiments or
other interactions with the material, they deepen their understanding of the
content.
Once they’ve explored, students attempt to explain what they have
learned and experienced with help from the teacher – who only then explains
concepts or terms encountered during exploration.
From there, students elaborate on
their understanding, applying what they’ve learned to new situations to deepen
their skills. In the final phase, students evaluate, reflecting on and providing evidence
of their new understanding of the material.
At first glance, this seems like a good model for hands-on,
student-centered instructional learning. However, this model misfires in one
critical sense: it is used as a linear progression. Engagement comes first,
exploring, explaining, and elaborating follow, and then evaluating wraps up the
process
You have well elaborated the 5Es and also critiqued it.
ReplyDelete